Field-Level Financial Assessment of Contour Prairie Strips for Enhancement of Environmental Quality

Publication

Publication Type:

Journal Article

Authors:

Tyndall, J. C.; Schulte, L. A.; Liebman, M.; Helmers, M.

Source:

Environmental Management, Volume 52, Number 3, p.736-747 (2013)

ISBN:

0364-152X

Accession Number:

WOS:000323661700015

Keywords:

Agricultural Best Management Practices, agricultural productivity, biodiversity, conservation, Contour prairie strips, cost-effectiveness, ecosystem services, filter strips, Financial analysis-perennial conservation practice, management, quality, reduction, us, US Corn Belt, Water, watershed-scale

Abstract:

The impacts of strategically located contour prairie strips on sediment and nutrient runoff export from watersheds maintained under an annual row crop production system have been studied at a long-term research site in central Iowa. Data from 2007 to 2011 indicate that the contour prairie strips utilized within row crop-dominated landscapes have greater than proportionate and positive effects on the functioning of biophysical systems. Crop producers and land management agencies require comprehensive information about the Best Management Practices with regard to performance efficacy, operational/management parameters, and the full range of financial parameters. Here, a farm-level financial model assesses the establishment, management, and opportunity costs of contour prairie strips within cropped fields. Annualized, depending on variable opportunity costs the 15-year present value cost of utilizing contour prairie strips ranges from $590 to $865 ha(-1) year(-1) ($240-$350 ac(-1) year(-1)). Expressed in the context of "treatment area" (e.g., in this study 1 ha of prairie treats 10 ha of crops), the costs of contour prairie strips can also be viewed as $59 to about $87 per treated hectare ($24-$35 ac(-1)). If prairie strips were under a 15-year CRP contract, total per acre cost to farmers would be reduced by over 85 %. Based on sediment, phosphorus, and nitrogen export data from the related field studies and across low, medium, and high land rent scenarios, a megagram (Mg) of soil retained within the watershed costs between $7.79 and $11.46 mg(-1), phosphorus retained costs between $6.97 and $10.25 kg(-1), and nitrogen retained costs between $1.59 and $2.34 kg(-1). Based on overall project results, contour prairie strips may well become one of the key conservation practices used to sustain US Corn Belt agriculture in the decades to come.

Notes:

ISI Document Delivery No.: 208FD Times Cited: 2 Cited Reference Count: 59 Cited References: Afari-Sefa V, 2008, J INT FARM MANAG, V4, P1 Atwell RC, 2009, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V24, P791, DOI 10.1007/s10980-009-9358-4 Batie SS, 2009, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V7, P380, DOI 10.1890/080004 Beecher JA, 1996, CONT WATER RES ED, V104, P28 Chouinard HH, 2008, LAND ECON, V8, P66 Christianson L., 2011, THESIS IOWA STATE U Dosskey M, 2012, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V67, p37A, DOI [10.2489/jSWC.67.2.37A, 10.2489/jswc.67.2.37A] Duffy M, 2012, C270 IOW STAT U, P5 Duffy M, 2010, ROTATION PROFITABILI Edwards W, 2011, C220, P4 Edwards W, 2012, C2010 IOW STAT U EXT, P11 Fargione JE, 2009, BIOSCIENCE, V59, P767, DOI 10.1525/bio.2009.59.9.8 Goy BA, 2011, CHOICES, V26 Gu RR, 2009, WORLD ACAD SCI ENG T, V54 Gurr GM, 2003, BASIC APPL ECOL, V4, P107, DOI 10.1078/1439-1791-00122 Helmers MJ, 2012, J ENVIRON QUAL, V41, P1531, DOI 10.2134/jeq2011.0473 Helmi M, 2011, PODC 11: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2011 ACM SYMPOSIUM PRINCIPLES OF DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING, P139 Hernandez-Santana V, 2013, J HYDROL, V477, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.11.013 Jarchow M, 2011, 1007 PMR IOW STAT U Jenkins WA, 2010, ECOL ECON, V69, P1051, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.022 Johanns AM, 2011, AG DECISION MAKER CO Claassen R, 2008, ECOL ECON, V65, P737, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.032 Jordan N, 2007, SCIENCE, V316, P1570, DOI 10.1126/science.1141700 Keplinger KO, 2004, SMALL FLOWS Q, V5, P36 Khanna M, 2009, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V52, P575, DOI 10.1080/09640560902958115 Kling C, 2007, CONSEVATION PRACTICE Liebman M, 2010, MANAGING AGR LANDSCA Liebman M, 2013, RENEW AGR FOOD SYST, V28, P115, DOI 10.1017/S1742170512000300 MacDonald AL, 2012, THESIS IOWA STATE U McCown RL, 2005, FARMERS DECISION Navrud S., 1997, Environmental and Resource Economics, V10, P1, DOI 10.1023/A:1026449715284 Pannell DJ, 1999, INT J SOC ECON, V26, P999, DOI 10.1108/03068299910245769 Pimentel David, 2009, P89, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-8992-3_4 Prairie Seed Farms, 2011, ONL SEED CAT IOW CRP Prokopy LS, 2008, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V63, P300, DOI 10.2489/jswc.63.5.300 Reganold JP, 2011, SCIENCE, V332, P670, DOI 10.1126/science.1202462 Ribaudo MO, 2005, ECOL ECON, V52, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.07.021 Ritter WF, 2001, AGR NONPOINT SOURCE, P342 Robertson GP, 2005, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V3, P38, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0038:RAPAEI]2.0.CO;2 Schulte LA, 2006, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V61, p164A Schulte LA, 2008, 1002 PMR IOW STAT U Secchi S., 2008, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V63, P68, DOI DOI 10.2489/JSWC.63.3.68A Secchi S, 2007, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V62, P10 Shakhramanyan N, 2012, IETSR1 LEUPH U LUN Song F, 2011, AM J AGR ECON, V93, P764, DOI 10.1093/ajae/aar018 Tegtmeier E. M., 2004, International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, V2, P1 Tix D, 2003, MNRC200320 MINN DEP, P62 Tyndall JC, 2009, AGROFOREST SYST, V76, P237, DOI 10.1007/s10457-008-9140-7 US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2013, FHW111A US FISH WILD [USDA Economic Research Service (ERS)], 2011, AV US FARM PRIC SEL [USDA NASS], 2002, 2002 CENS AGR [USDA NRCS], 2011, COUNT BUFF STRIPS IO [USDA NRCS], 1998, NAT RES EC HDB 611 [USDA NRCS], 2011, RAT FED WAT PROJ NRC World Bank, 2004, MON EV SOM TOOLS MET Wortmann C, 2011, RP197 U NEBR LINC Wossink A, 2007, ECOL ECON, V64, P297, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.003 Yang Q, 2010, J ENVIRON QUAL, V39, P220, DOI 10.2134/jeq2009.0157 Yuan Y, 2002, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V57, P259 Tyndall, John C. Schulte, Lisa A. Liebman, Matthew Helmers, Matthew Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture [E2006-13]; USDA-AFRI [IOW05249] This work was funded by the Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture (Title: The Impact of Biodiversity Services in Rowcrop Production in Annual versus Perennial Landscapes; Grant E2006-13) and USDA-AFRI Project Number: IOW05249. Springer New york

Tags:

financial analysis