Effects of native perennial vegetation buffer strips on dissolved organic carbon in surface runoff from an agricultural landscape

Submitted by senloe on Thu, 10/16/2014 - 12:27

Publication Type:

Journal Article


Biogeochemistry, Volume 120, Number 1-3, p.121-132 (2014)



Accession Number:



Corn, DOC, export, land-use, management-practices, matter, nitrogen, Prairie, prairie filter strips, Row-crop, Soybeans, streams, usa, watersheds


Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) constitutes a small yet important part of a watershed's carbon budget because it is mobile and biologically active. Agricultural conservation practices such as native perennial vegetation (NPV) strips will influence carbon cycling of an upland agroecosystem, and could affect how much DOC enters streams in runoff, potentially affecting aquatic ecosystems. In a study conducted in Iowa (USA), four treatments with strips of NPV varying in slope position and proportion of area were randomly assigned among 12 small agricultural watersheds in a balanced incomplete block design. Runoff samples from 2008 to 2010 were analyzed for DOC and correlated with flow data to determine flow weighted DOC concentrations and loads. Data were analyzed for the entire 3 years, annually, seasonally, monthly, by flow event size and for one extreme storm event. Overall we found few differences in DOC concentration with the exception that concentrations were greater in the 10 % NPV at the footslope watersheds than the 20 % NPV in contours watersheds over the 3 years, and the 100 % agricultural treatment had higher DOC concentrations than all NPV treatments during the one extreme event. Because the NPV treatments reduced runoff, DOC export tended to be highest in the 100 % agricultural watersheds over the 3 years and during high flows. We also compared two watersheds that were restored to 100 % NPV and found decreases in DOC concentrations and loads indicating that complete conversion to prairie leads to less watershed DOC export. Regression results also support the contention that increases in the percentage of NPV in the watershed decreases watershed export of DOC. Further analysis indicated that DOC concentrations were diluted as flow event size increased, independent of any treatment effects. It appears groundwater sources become an important component to flow as flow event size increases in these watersheds.


ISI Document Delivery No.: AM5BX<br/>Times Cited: 0<br/>Cited Reference Count: 36<br/>Cited References: <br/> Agren A, 2008, AQUAT SCI, V70, P21, DOI 10.1007/s00027-007-0943-9<br/> Avalos JMM, 2009, COMMUN SOIL SCI PLAN, V40, P200, DOI 10.1080/00103620802625542<br/> Borin M, 2010, EUR J AGRON, V32, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2009.05.003<br/> Brye KR, 2001, J ENVIRON QUAL, V30, P58<br/> Brye KR, 2002, ECOL APPL, V12, P962, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0962:CBFAPA]2.0.CO;2<br/> Chantigny MH, 2003, GEODERMA, V113, P357, DOI 10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00370-1<br/> Dalzell BJ, 2005, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V110, DOI 10.1029/2005JG000043<br/> Dalzell BJ, 2007, GEOCHIM COSMOCHIM AC, V71, P1448, DOI 10.1016/j.gca.2006.12.009<br/> Dalzell BJ, 2011, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V116, DOI 10.1029/2010JG001540<br/> Dittman JA, 2009, ENVIRON POLLUT, V157, P1953, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.01.031<br/> Eichmiller JJ, 2007, THESIS KANSAS STATE, P87<br/> Frank Hagedorn, 2000, Biogeochemistry (Dordrecht), V50, P137, DOI 10.1023/A:1006398105953<br/> Helmers MJ, 2012, J ENVIRON QUAL, V41, P1531, DOI 10.2134/jeq2011.0473<br/> Hernandez-Santana V, 2013, J HYDROL, V477, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.11.013<br/> Inamdar SP, 2004, HYDROL PROCESS, V18, P2261<br/> Jacinthe PA, 2004, SOIL TILL RES, V77, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2003.11.004<br/> Mailapalli DR, 2010, AGR WATER MANAGE, V98, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.07.009<br/> MCDOWELL WH, 1988, ECOL MONOGR, V58, P177, DOI 10.2307/2937024<br/> Raymond PA, 2010, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, V100, P197, DOI 10.1007/s10533-010-9416-7<br/> Royer I, 2007, J ENVIRON QUAL, V36, P855, DOI 10.2134/jeq2006.0355<br/> Royer TV, 2005, AQUAT SCI, V67, P465, DOI 10.1007/s00027-005-0781-6<br/> Sanderman J, 2009, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, V92, P41, DOI 10.1007/s10533-008-9249-9<br/> Schilling KE, 2007, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V112, DOI 10.1029/2007JG000405<br/> Schmitt TJ, 1999, J ENVIRON QUAL, V28, P1479<br/> Stanley EH, 2012, FRESHWATER BIOL, V57, P26, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02613.x<br/> Stedmon CA, 2006, ESTUARIES COASTS, V29, P388<br/> Tomer MD, 2010, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V139, P206, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2010.08.003<br/> Tomer MD, 2003, J ENVIRON QUAL, V32, P642<br/> Udawatta RP, 2006, REV SCI EAU, V19, P137<br/> Veum KS, 2009, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V130, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2008.12.006<br/> Vidon P, 2008, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, V88, P257, DOI 10.1007/s10533-008-9207-6<br/> Warrner TJ, 2009, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, V95, P295, DOI 10.1007/s10533-009-9337-5<br/> Wilson HF, 2009, NAT GEOSCI, V2, P37, DOI 10.1038/NGEO391<br/> Xenopoulos MA, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, EVOLUTION AND ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION, P36<br/> Zhou X, 2014, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V69, P54, DOI 10.2489/jswc.69.1.54<br/> Zhou XB, 2010, J ENVIRON QUAL, V39, P2006, DOI 10.2134/jeq2010.0151<br/>Smith, Tomorra E. Kolka, Randall K. Zhou, Xiaobo Helmers, Matthew J. Cruse, Richard M. Tomer, Mark D.<br/>Springer<br/>Dordrecht